| Author |
|
jaypeezie
Newbie
Joined: 17 May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: 17 June 2009 at 12:17pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi,
I have the following rules which works pretty well but only for those URLs that only have 9 words or less, otherwise it adds a 0 to the 10th word, 1 to the 11th word, 2 to the 12th word and so on:
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)-($9)-($10)-($11)-($12)-($13)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)-($9)-($10)-($11)-($12)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)-($9)-($10)-($11)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)-($9)-($\10)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)-($9)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)-($8)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)-($7)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)-($6)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)-($5)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)-($4)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)-($3)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
| RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)_(.*)/ /blog/($1)-($2)/ [R=301,NC,L] |
|
RewriteRule ^weblog/permalink/(.*)/ /blog/($1)/ [R=301,NC,L]
Is there a better way to do this?
Cheers,
JAY |
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Anton
Admin Group
Joined: 30 January 2007
Location: Ukraine
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10520
|
| Posted: 18 June 2009 at 1:05am | IP Logged
|
|
|
ISAPI_Rewrite (as well as Apache) supports back references only from $0 to $9.
This limitation is planned to be eliminated in the next versions of ISAPI_Rewrite.
__________________
Regards,
Anton
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
pawlos
Newbie
Joined: 09 February 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 09 February 2010 at 10:50am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Sorry for writing in an old topic but when one might expect that this limitation will be eliminated?
I'm running the 3.1.0.69 version and still have the same problem.
Regards,
Pawel
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Anton
Admin Group
Joined: 30 January 2007
Location: Ukraine
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10520
|
| Posted: 10 February 2010 at 3:32am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Sorry, but this is not a top priority task for us as we still tend to be Apache-compatible.
I can't promise it will be accomplished soon. The idea is still being discussed.
__________________
Regards,
Anton
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
pawlos
Newbie
Joined: 09 February 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 10 February 2010 at 7:22am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Anton,
Thanks for your answer. I'm just thinking why there is this limitation in the first place. You could have support more then 10 back references and still have 100% compatibility with Apache's mod_rewrite (you could have used different character before them or even with the same).
It's just artificial limitation you introduced that now needs dev time to be fixed - and of course there's always no time for those non-critical changes.
Regards,
Pawel
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Anton
Admin Group
Joined: 30 January 2007
Location: Ukraine
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10520
|
| Posted: 10 February 2010 at 9:05am | IP Logged
|
|
|
"It's just artificial limitation you introduced" - it's not we who introduced it. It's Apache...
I'll talk to our developers and they'll decide when they can do that.
__________________
Regards,
Anton
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
pawlos
Newbie
Joined: 09 February 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 10 February 2010 at 9:14am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Anton,
Ok, you wanted to be 100% compliant with Apache. You could have had that even with the support for more than 10 back references. You could have just use different character for back references above 9.
So the dev would use $0-$9 for first ten and the rules will be compatible with Apache's and if someone what to use 10th, 11th, ... they have to use for example @10,@11.
Regards,
Pawel
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Anton
Admin Group
Joined: 30 January 2007
Location: Ukraine
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10520
|
| Posted: 11 February 2010 at 3:25am | IP Logged
|
|
|
We've discussed the issue, and I hope we'll implement it next week. I'll inform you as soon as it's done.
__________________
Regards,
Anton
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
pawlos
Newbie
Joined: 09 February 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
|
| Posted: 11 February 2010 at 7:40am | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hi Anton,
Thanks for your reply. I've just one question. A friend of mine got an answer from your support that stated:
"Hello,
Yes, you’re correct. ISAPI_Rewrite 2 can provide you with regular expression
for the rest of parameters like $10, $11, $12 etc."
Is this true that ISAPI_Rewrite 2 supports more than 10 parameters but version 3 does not?
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Anton
Admin Group
Joined: 30 January 2007
Location: Ukraine
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10520
|
| Posted: 11 February 2010 at 9:19am | IP Logged
|
|
|
"Is this true that ISAPI_Rewrite 2 supports more than 10 parameters but version 3 does not?" - yes, it's true.
So meanwhile you can try using it.
__________________
Regards,
Anton
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Helicon Tech : Common Questions
Topic: Urgent Help - Regex Newbie - $10, $11??
Active Topics
Memberlist
Help
Register
Login